Cotton and Organic Cotton - What's the Difference?

David Platt • 28 June 2019

We want you to remain environmentally friendly.

Cotton is a natural fibre grown as crop in the US, China, India and Turkey amongst others. Being a natural fibre, cotton fabric will naturally biodegrade unlike the petrochemical based fabrics like polyester, nylon or rayon.

Cotton does come under some criticism environmentally because of the amount of pesticides and herbicides used on the crop and also the amount of water it consumes – particularly important since the crop is grown in hot climates.

In terms of the chemicals used to grow cotton the Organic Trade Association of the US claims that "Cotton is notorious for being one of the world’s most chemically intensive crops. Conventional cotton production soaks up 16-25% of the total pesticides produced worldwide, even though the crop itself only covers about 2.5% of the world’s total agricultural land".

Being a crop grown in hot climates the water used in irrigation is excessively high – although the US Cotton Growers body claim: "Cotton is very drought and heat-tolerant. Cotton does NOT require excessive amounts of water. In fact, cotton uses less water than many other major crops produced in this country. Only 35% of U.S. cotton acreage requires some form of irrigation-the rest of the cotton land is supplied by natural rainfall."

There is also a claim that the production of fibre and cloth is also water intensive. Although much of this water will be cleaned and recycled in many countries. The water effect in other countries can be dramatic – as reported in this MSPKU article:

"One of the most shocking examples of depletion of water resources caused by cotton plantations is the Aral Sea in Uzbekistan, which until 1960 was ranked fourth in the world in terms of size. Today, the lake area is only 25% of the initial size, and it holds only 10% of the initial volume of water. Due to rapacious water management for cotton bushes, the shore of that lake suffers from serious economic and ecological problems".

Given the conflicting comments it is difficult to draw firm conclusions. Using organic cotton (which does not use the chemicals in its farming) and which is naturally biodegrading may be a good option versus the polyester alternative. Although, it is possible to get polyester made from recycled bottles. Like many things environmental, the arguments are complex.

Our advice – use organic cotton, not cotton, and better still a recycled polyester.

References

http://mskpu.pl/en/cotton-not-so-environmentally-friendly/

http://www.cottoncampus.org/cotton-environmentally-friendly-sustainability/

https://ota.com/organic-cotton-it%E2%80%99s-better-environment-and-here%E2%80%99s-why

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Share this blog:

Evaluating Carbon Footprint in Branded Merchandise

by David Platt • 13 April 2026

SUMMARY: Comparing eco promotional products is difficult because of the range of materials used Carbon footprint is a measure which allows comparison Need to look at CO2 equivalent because of the use of organic solvents in promotional merchandise There is a difference between Cradle to Gate and Cradle to Grave in the measurement, because we never know whether the end user will attempt to recycle products Pavilion is a specialist in providing branded promotional products, which are sustainable. The most common question we're asked, of course, is what's the most sustainable branded product? And how would you measure that? And that's a difficult question and often comes with hesitations. Why? This blog aims to try and explain eco credentials, particularly for promotional merchandise and how you might compare them. The first problem you have, is that you're comparing different materials. This is why it's difficult is because there's no true standard of sustainability. There is no international marking that says, this one's a 10, and this one's a 1. The nearest you have is carbon footprint. Carbon footprint generally means the amount of carbon dioxide measured in kilos, but you have to be a bit careful with that, particularly for promotional merchandise because carbon dioxide is not the only greenhouse gas. You may be fully aware that methane, natural gas has a global warming effect 50 to 60 times more than CO2. So, you don't need to measure just CO2, you've really have to look at a CO2 equivalent. In other words, converting the methane. And why do I mention that? Promotional merchandise is often printed and unless you are using water based inks, there will be solvents, and therefore, CO2 equivalent is what you need to measure. The next problem that you've have is what are you measuring the carbon footprint of? Are we talking what's termed - Cradle to Grave or Cradle to Gate? The concept is explained in the diagram.

Cork for Eco Branded Merchandise

17 February 2026

Cork - what is it? where does it come from and is it a sustainable product? This blog answers these questions and explains why cork is such a great material